Archive for the ‘Muse’ Category

ain’t no thang (on life in *T*he District)

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

Laurenellen McCann



Last weekend, I had the opportunity to revisit an old habit that I’ve sadly abandoned since moving to DC: the urban wander. In other cityscapes, I’ve spent entire days journeying through concrete forms and twisty streets, hiking up promising hills, chasing treelines, nestling on park benches — the perfect voyeur. The jolly watcher.

It occurred to me — big camera hanging from my side — that wandering aimlessly through downtown DC made me a tourist. Of course, unlike a tourist, I was totally unphased when the trees parted on Pennsylvania Avenue and a huge, white building sprung out.

Oh, yeah, the Capitol.

Hallowed halls. The outward-in essence of DC. Government. Liberty. History. A hunk of a dome tossed with some pillars. Funny (?) how (easily) it fades into the background…

the chuck berry addendum

Monday, February 8th, 2010

In a recent post, I almost went on a tangent about why The Older Generation should have appreciated Mr. Berry, rejecting that jazz about the Devil and hips and the like.

…But upon further listening, Chuck himself makes a case against friendship with the 1950s model of Ma and Pa. Thought I’d share. Viva la rock.

Soon as three o’clock rolls around/You finally lay your burden down
Close up your books, get out of your seat/Down the halls and into the street
Up to the corner and ’round the bend/Right to the juke joint, you go in

Drop the coin right into the slot/You’re gotta hear somethin’ that’s really hot
With the one you love, you’re makin’ romance /All day long you been wantin’ to dance,
Feeling the music from head to toe/Round and round and round we go

Hail, hail rock and roll /Deliver me from the days of old
Long live rock and roll/The beat of the drums, loud and bold
Rock, rock, rock and roll/The feelin’ is there, body and soul.

cat sitting

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

Laurenellen McCann

It’s a pun. Get it?

George , the feline sitting pretty above(^), is probably the only cat (or one of the only cats) I’ve ever really enjoyed spending time with. I never really “got” cats. You could probably attribute this to the fact that I haven’t spent very much time with cats, and you’d be right. I haven’t…But my thoughts on the difficulties of cat-ownership have recently extended to pet ownership in general.

Now, I grew up a dog person (almost literally if you count my time spent as “Puppy Lauren”) and I was raised to believe in the love and companionship and wonder that pets provide. A pet is another bundle of life in your family, something(someone?) to cuddle with and care for, someone to be responsible to…The relationship is great. I won’t deny it. Heck, I won’t even deny craving it.

But…unlike, say, a (human) sister or parent or friend, what your pet does when you’re not there is…sit around your house. Climb on the furniture. Eat. Sleep. Chew on a toy. Basically, they just pace and circle and inhabit a small space.

Sure, you say, they’re animals and they need space, but they’re domesticated animals.

So what does that mean? That taking a pet outside once in a blue moon is enough? That the space to roam is only important (or relevant) because they’re animal…and because they’re “domesticated” that they get enough? I know that I feel trapped staying in the same space (house, room, etc) for long periods of time. And I know that I’m an animal. Of sorts. But just the idea that I can change my situation as I see fit where your dog or cat (let alone bunny, fish…) can’t is something that’s made me (re)consider pet-ownership.

Then again, look at George. George has a cat door and she can come and go as she pleases. Often, she’s pleased to cuddle up beside me on the couch. Sometimes she decides to leave and play outside with her stray cat friends down the street. “Consent” is probably a loaded word to bring into this stream-of-consciousness/fluff blog post, butttt…having that semblance of choice seems more satisfying to me as a potential, future “owner.” Maybe I’m more of a cat person than I thought.

i, poet

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Housewives take note:

Chuck Berry is the ultimate soundtrack for house-cleaning.

In other news, machines write poetry! …Sort of.

Rather, futurist Ray Kurzweil’s Cybernetic Poet //interprets// poetry…by writing its own. Reading the first sample of its work (“Pages”) left me skeptical, but there was something rather poignant (and adorably sad) about the haiku The Poet composed after reading poems by Patricia Camarena Rose and Wendy Dennis*:

The Stifling Stuffy

The stifling stuffy
Catholic schoolroom,
where I cannot be real

Oh, and what //is// a Cybernetic Poet?

  • Short answer: a flexible, intelligent, language-based computer program.
  • Long(er) Answer: a linguistic-modeling program with the ability to analyze/generate poetic personality and structure through a series of mathematical and poetic criteria.
  • Exhaustive answer: here.

*Can someone link me to original poetry by these ladies? A preliminary search failed to turn up anything.

here’s to django, my “hero”

Monday, February 1st, 2010

From Django Reinhardt: 100 Years of Hot Jazz

LEAD
…with no formal training
the guitarist developed a new style of music in the 30s and 40s
which came to be dubbed ‘gypsy jazz’
he’s one of the very few european musicians to ever exert a serious influence on the American artform of jazz.

TOM COLE
People, even those who knew him, speak of Django Reinhardt with a kind of awe, as almost some superhuman being consumed with music.
___________________________________________________________________________________________

My roommate and I recently discovered that we were both without heroes growing up — that isn’t to say we lacked any role models — I’m still waiting for you, Spiderman! — but rather that we lacked Hero Worship. We lacked figures who embodied evvvverything we wanted to be. The conversation wound on to how instead we appreciated individual attributes, blah, blah, blah…But soon I found myself wondering about the people I did fetishize, people whom I didn’t want to necessarily be, but couldn’t help but adore.

David Bowie (as Ziggy Stardust) comes to mind a little too quickly, though not before my childhood favorites, Jane Goodall and Tolkein (coughGandolfcough). There have been other authors: I’ve flirted with Vonnegut, messed around with Nabokov. Surely Orson Wells and his ego got stuck in there somewhere. Lawrence Lessig’s been doing pretty well nowadays.

They’re not, really, my heroes, but they might as well be: they’re superhuman. Through their celebrity and their accomplishments and eccentricities, all these names and so many more are superhuman. Bigger than the rest of us.

And that’s what heroes are, I think: people who stand out. People whose achievements save us from ourselves, offering us escape or hope or innovation. By seemingly standing on their own shoulders, these fey folk have poked holes through the clouds to cast themselves in heavenly spotlights while we look up at them and stare.

The line between Hero-material and Celebrity has grown decidedly thin…Sure, there are “Everyday Heroes”, but we usually only whip out that label to add some pizazz to a lifestyle that can be easily grouped and taken for granted (firefighters, moms, local conservationists).

True Hero- or Celebrity-status obscures the fact that these superhumans are walking around eating and sleeping and sweating and panicking like the rest of us. If you could catch them at the deli counter away from their body guards, you could walk right up and poke them in the nose.

I guess you can practice true Hero Worship and forgive all the imperfections, but it’s hard for me to wrap my head around it. I can’t even worship a supposedly perfect being properly. I prefer to think that there are some people with extraordinary ability and that their power is just that — talent. There is something in their chromosomes — be there 46 of them or otherwise — that lets these people see, act, shape, make, dream, build, sing, etc., etc., etc. until they do the impossible: create matter. Whatever.

…Which somehow brings me back to Django Reinhardt. The world celebrated his 100th birthday for him a few days ago. Untrained in anything but being awesome, as a young man he picked up a guitar, made an incredible impact on American jazz and swing (as a foreigner, to boot!), and gave mustache doubters a run for their money.

He changed my life, too. Sure, it was really thanks to Limewire that we met (RIAA, plz ignore!!), but without Django’s jaunty strumming, I would have never fallen head over heels — jitterbug style — for swing.

He may not be my hero, but Django was one gosh-darn talented superhuman-human…being.

Many happy returns.

hairvetica (or, font in the wild)

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

To follow up on our  recent series on fonts, I want to share this great blog entry a friend tweeted earlier: Examples of Typography in the Wild.

There are some pretty glorious examples in the list, but to wet your appetite, an example of awesome:

(^) Amadine Alessandra. Type Should Move.

Vladimir Koncar
(^) Vladimir Koncar, Hairvetica

Vladimir Zivkovic

(^) Vladimir Zivkovic, Slavonska Abeceda

a delayed reply to my last post

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

(Read last post.)

Sooo…I guess that’s the beauty of blogging — avoiding the rewrite.

I was just reflecting how every news, non-profit, for-profit, freelancer, consultor, denstist outfit, private citizen, and Beanie Baby collector is in a position now to rewrite and refilter the news. There’s pressure if you run your own website remotely connected to the world outside yourself (—which is everyone?—) to write and respond to news. Tell the news from your perspective. Tell how everyone else got the news wrong. Spin. Clarification. Whatever.

Putting aside the discussion of the possibility or role of “journalistic objectivity”, when everyone **rewrites** the news, what they’re actually trying to do is **respond** to the news. Re-writing the news is then a waste of time for…well, all parties involved.

Cue the blog — a space to reference, site, and RESPOND to current events, quips, blips, etc. Save your breath with a link back to the news site of your choosing and tell us your reason for posting. What do you have to say?

The blog centralizes the role of the individual/organization response to news, places new relevance in /some/ sort of news aggregater (whether its more of a general RSS feed than a NYT is open for discussion), reduces associated spam/redudant content, and saves workers from menial tasks.

Sounds pretty good to me…

time traveller

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

JogiART
One more.

Creative Nerds also posted this Collection of Beautiful Light Paintings.

Way before all this Photoshop stuff, we painted with light in real time. I remember my mother lugging out the tripod and the big-as-your-head storm lamp, whispering to me about apertures and shutters and things while I ran around on our frontlawn. I wish I had paid more attention to her. I was totally (pre)occupied mapping out my light painting against the sky.

Once Mom finally had everything ready to go, I’d slip behind her and the camera and draw in front of the lens. My eyes caught only the wisps of arcs and lines searing the dark, but the camera would remember them all.

Every now and then, Mom would dart out in front of the open shutter, or she’d ask me stand out, front and center, while she doodled over me.

I don’t remember seeing the pictures later, but I do remember falling in love with long exposures.

(Meanwhile, top right: ‘The Time Traveller’ by ~JogiART)

from hand to brand (on font and identity)

Saturday, December 12th, 2009

In my sickness today, ‘word art’ — specifically, typography portraits — caught my attention.

Remember the Jay-Z video? (See above.)

Artist Evan Roth creates portraits of Jay using only the word Brooklyn. It’s simple and pretty stunning to behold. (And — *geek points* — it was apparently made with Open Code AND you can actually download the source code.)

Jay’s infectious beats came into my head while I was checking out this list of 25 Beautiful Examples of Typography Portraits on Creative Nerds. (A new favorite website and awesome skillz resource. (Yes, with a ‘z’.))

***
I’m trying to decide whether I respond better/like to the portraits where the words and letters mean something — even if its cliche. When the letters are random, it feels a little like cheating: of course an ‘l’ makes a nice bridge for the nose, but what else can you do with it? What can a word do in place of it? What does it mean to have word instead of a letter?

Then again, words with ‘meaning’ all over a face feel a little contrived. Here are some the ones I found more interesting, from both sides of random/ordered divide:

Caliburless Soul

'Weiland Type' by Caliburless Soul (^)

vic198x

The Brooklyn inspired ‘My Portrait’ by vic198x (^)

thierry-eamon

(My fav) ‘Erik Spiekermann’ by thierry-eamon (^)

I’d be interested to check out the impact of word- and letter-based portraiture prior to The Computer Age. Maybe I’m just a biased Gen X-er…or, er, Gen Y-er…or, whatever, but personal observation and cold facts confirm that computers have ushered in a new era of font-appreciation and worship (driven largely by the growing web design community, no doubt).

Part of it must be the expansion of branding. Companies have long relied on a manufactured style and graphic stamp to create a character. Yes, although corporations may be individuals under the law, to the surprise of no one they lack overt personalized qualities — like handwriting or vocal pitch for instance.

As more and more people turn to the net and become Users, they face a similar problem. All the ticks and quirks that identify people ‘in the real world’ are innately missing when they sign online. So, Users turn to text for differentiation. Different font colors and styles (in addition to one’s written ‘voice’) become identity markers — a User’s personal brand, if you will.

What’s my brand?

Less than having a font face (har har), I think my User brand is based in my style of writing. The more I write publicly, the more I notice certain patterns in my (written) language…especially the influence of my punctuation-queer, wordsmith hero, e.e. cummings…

***

(Oh, and if you need any convincing that there is, in fact, a great deal of energy, attention, and devotion to fonts, see the documetary Helvetica about the font of the same name.)

charis wilson died yesterday:

Saturday, December 12th, 2009

Nude 1936

Charis, Lake Ediza

Charis Wilson 1935

Charis Wilson, who was lover, muse, model, amanuensis and wife of the photographer Edward Weston and the subject of many of his best-known nude portraits, died on Friday in Santa Cruz, Calif. She was 95. (NYT)

Edward Weston: American photographer, founder of Group f/64. His work only continues to gather power as it colors and ages. (A common feature of the f/64 crew as a whole…)

It’s his composition, I think, that feels so piercing and on target. Composition and contrast. The color almost doesn’t matter when the body is laid out so clearly and so fearlessly…it’s just…honest. To the point of being confrontational.

The photographer exposes himself in the image: Look at the last two photographs. I’m sure that Weston shot Wilson hundreds of times, but taken together, these two portraits show something startlingly intimate. Weston’s favorite view of Charis, maybe: arms akimbo, legs spread, eyes locked (with his)…face straight, head bonneted, expression equal parts patient and removed.

Weston loved her. Look how Wilson folds her body. You can almost hear Weston’s voice — soothing, asking her gently to move to the left or right. To sit. Coming over, he eases her head down against her kneecap.

Stare back at Charis and you stare at Weston. Give into him. He’s trying to give you a piece of himself: the honesty of shared silence, early mornings, the moment (just after) you are taken off your guard.